Phil Parker (tigertoy) wrote,
Phil Parker

Variations on Clarke's Law

Someone linked to this comic in a locked post.  After I finished sporfling, I had these random thoughts:

Everyone is familiar with Clarke's Law ("Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.")  A lot of people have come up with jokes or tag lines twisting it around in various ways.  A piece, I'm pretty sure by Arlan Andrews, I'm pretty sure published in Analog in the 80s (probably a Probability Zero) called "Indian Summa", took a couple of pages to set up "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology."  Berry Gehm quipped, somewhen, that "Any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced."  There was a fortune cookie on one of the Unix systems I once worked on that claimed "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature."

Does anyone have any more good variations on this time-honored theme?
Tags: humor, questions
  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened