?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Variations on Clarke's Law - Phil's Rambling Rants
March 23rd, 2010
12:35 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Variations on Clarke's Law
Someone linked to this comic in a locked post.  After I finished sporfling, I had these random thoughts:

Everyone is familiar with Clarke's Law ("Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.")  A lot of people have come up with jokes or tag lines twisting it around in various ways.  A piece, I'm pretty sure by Arlan Andrews, I'm pretty sure published in Analog in the 80s (probably a Probability Zero) called "Indian Summa", took a couple of pages to set up "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology."  Berry Gehm quipped, somewhen, that "Any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced."  There was a fortune cookie on one of the Unix systems I once worked on that claimed "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature."

Does anyone have any more good variations on this time-honored theme?

Tags: ,

(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:shockwave77598
Date:March 23rd, 2010 06:59 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Any magic is distinguished from sufficiently advanced technology in that you never have to recharge anything.
[User Picture]
From:exapno
Date:March 26th, 2010 04:02 am (UTC)
(Link)
Don't know if i'll get online tomorrow, so wanted to wish you a very happy birthday!!! May this coming year be happier & healthier for you *huggs*
Powered by LiveJournal.com